Friday, December 14, 2018

CVN

American Medical Forensics Specialists (AMFS), the nation’s preeminent Medical Expert Witness network has partnered with Courtroom View Network (CVN), to provide AMFS clients with 3 months of free access to CVN Essentials, which includes an AMFS curated expert witness library.

With a CVN Essentials Membership, you'll get exclusive access to some of the most critical moments in high stakes trials across the country. Watch and learn the techniques used by the country's best attorneys in their biggest trials. Membership gives you:

  • Access to over 250 video clips from biggest trials
  • Expert commentary from trusted Medical Expert Witnesses
  • Trials in 20 Minutes highlight episodes and more.

Interested in diving even deeper? Receive 25% discount on the annual subscription to the CVN Video Library along with your CVN Essentials membership. Enroll Now


Dr. Katharine Wenstrom Concludes a Mother's Post-Partum, Catastrophic Brain Damage Could Have Been Avoided in $46M Med Mal Case

The Trial: Trabue v. Atlanta Women’s Specialists, a medical malpractice trial over the catastrophic brain damage a woman suffered in a collapse days after she gave birth.

The Expert: Dr. Katharine Wenstrom, an obstetrician, testifies for the plaintiff and concludes that complications from unchecked preeclampsia and a pulmonary edema likely caused the new mother’s heart to stop.

The Verdict: $45.8 million.

View AMFS Commentary on the Testimony


Dr. Harris Fisk on the Interplay Between a Truck Crash Victim’s TBI and PTSD in $53M Trial

The Trial: Lennig v. CRST, et al., a California damages-only trial over injuries two brothers suffered in a head-on collision with a semi-truck.

The Expert: Dr. Harris Fisk, a neurologist, testifying for the plaintiff on the traumatic brain injury, post-traumatic stress disorder, and other complications one of the brothers suffered as a result of the crash.

The Verdict: $52.89 million total.

View AMFS Commentary on the Testimony


Dr. Susan Bukata Details an Emergency Amputation, En Route to a $35M Award in a Motorcycle Crash Case

The Trial: Ekbatani v. Caltrans, a personal injury trial over leg injuries a motorcycle rider suffered in a collision with a taxi van.

The Expert: Dr. Susan Bukata, an orthopedic surgeon, testifying for the plaintiff about the injuries he suffered and the need to amputate his leg.

The Verdict: $35 million.

View AMFS Commentary on the Testimony

 

 


Dr. Sigurd Berven’s Testimony About the Off-Label Use of Spinal Implant Helps Clear Surgeon in 7-Figure Med Mal Case

The Trial: Christina Avalos v. Dr. William Dobkin, a medical malpractice trial over the off-label use of a spinal implant.

The Expert: Dr. Sigurd Berven, an orthopedic surgeon at University of California San Francisco Medical Center, testifies for the defense on the use of the spinal implant and the standard of care in such procedures.

The Verdict: For the defense.

View AMFS Commentary on the Testimony


In $6M Wrongful Death Med Mal Trial, Dr. Hugo Cheng Outlines Bowel Obstruction Treatment Omissions

The Trial: Scoggins v. Smith, et al., a medical malpractice trial over the death of a 72-year-old hospital patient following a bowel obstruction. 

The Expert: Dr. Hugo Cheng, an internal medicine specialist at the University of California, San Francisco, testifies for the plaintiff on his belief that additional measures, such as a nasogastric tube CT scan and potential surgical consult, should have been implemented as part of the standard of care. 

The Verdict: $6 million.

View AMFS Commentary on the Testimony


Dr. Peter Salomon Delves Into Colonoscopy Details to Clear Doctor at Trial Over Patient’s Colon Cancer

The Trial: Kazandjian v. Vastola, a Florida medical malpractice trial in which a physician is accused of rushing a colonoscopy and missing a patient’s colon cancer.

The Expert: Dr. Peter Salomon, a gastroenterologist, testifying for the defense on the standard of care and in colonoscopies and the likelihood that plaintiff had a visually detectable cancer at the time of the colonoscopy at issue.

The Verdict:  For the defense.

View AMFS Commentary on the Testimony


Biomedical Engineer Reed Ayers Concludes Flaw Caused Hip Implant’s Failure, Before Jury Delivers $4.5M Verdict

The Trial: Warner v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc., a product liability case in which plaintiff claims laser etchings made on the Profemur R hip implant caused it to become brittle and fracture. 

The Expert: Reed Ayers, Ph.D, a biomechanical engineering expert, testifies about the effect of laser etchings on the implant and whether, in his view, a design or manufacturing defect existed.

The Verdict: $4.5 million.

View AMFS Commentary on the Testimony


Dr. Peter Shields Dissects Research Tying PCBs to Lymphoma, Leading to Monsanto Trial Win

The Trial: Steele, et al v. Monsanto Co., et al., a toxic tort trial in which plaintiff claims two men developed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma from Polychlorinated biphenyl (or PCB) used by agrochemical company Monsanto.

The Expert: Dr. Peter Shields, an oncologist at The Ohio State University, testified on behalf of the defense on research plaintiff offered in an attempt to link PCB exposure to non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

The Verdict: For the defense.

View AMFS Commentary on the Testimony


Psychologist Ellen Stein Highlights Impact of Former Kaiser Worker’s Discharge, Leading to $492K Verdict

The Trial: Warner v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc.

The Trial: Gonzalez v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., an employment discrimination trial in which the plaintiff claims she was discharged because her employer did not wish to pay to treat her son’s kidney disorder.

The Expert: Ellen Stein, Ph.D., a San Diego-based forensic psychologist, testifying for the plaintiff and providing her opinion on plaintiff’s psychological issues and appropriate treatment.

The Verdict: $492,000.

View AMFS Commentary on the Testimony


Dr. Jonathan Schleimer Questions TBI Diagnosis to Clear Concert Venue in Eight-Figure Trial

The Trial: Hickman v. Hard Rock Café, a premises liability case in which the plaintiff contends she suffered back and brain injuries during a concert.

The Expert: Dr. Jonathan Schleimer, a California-based neurologist testifying for the defense as to the severity of the plaintiff’s injuries.

The Verdict: For the defense.

View AMFS Commentary on the Testimony


Dr. Annie Yessaian Details Studies Linking Talc With Ovarian Cancer, Leading to $417M Jury Verdict

The Trial: Echeverria v. Johnson & Johnson, a California state court trial in which plaintiff contends she developed ovarian cancer because of long-term use of Johnson & Johnson’s talc-based products.

The Expert: Dr. Annie Yessaian, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Southern California’s Keck School of Medicine.

The Verdict: $417 million.

View AMFS Commentary on the Testimony


Dr. Mark Needham Details Standard of Care on Drug Side Effect Information, Helps Clear Doctor in Med Mal Trial

The Trial: Hyoung v. Yoo, a medical malpractice trial in which plaintiff suffered blistering and necrosis across more than 30 percent of her body after using an antibiotic prescribed by defendant physician for acne.

The Expert: Dr. Mark Needham, a family medicine specialist who testified as to the appropriateness of the medication at issue and the standard of care as to the detail a patient should give on a medication’s potential side effects. 

The Verdict: For the defense.

View AMFS Commentary on the Testimony


In $26M Med Mal Trial, Dr. Kalman Blumberg Details Treatment Delays He Concludes Caused Respiratory Collapse

The Trial: Williams v. St. Francis Hospital, a medical malpractice case in which plaintiff claims medical staff failed to properly treat a neck hematoma, leading to her respiratory collapse and resulting brain damage.

The Expert: Dr. Kalman Blumberg, an orthopedic surgeon based in Florida, testifies regarding the standard of care in treating a hematoma similar to the one suffered by the plaintiff.

The Verdict: $26 million.

View AMFS Commentary on the Testimony


Dr. Paul Holtzheimer Analyzes Standards of Electroshock Therapy Treatment, Leading to Defense Verdict in Med Mal Case

The Trial: Dadi v. Sharma., a medical malpractice case in which plaintiff, a cardiologist, claims he was improperly given electroshock therapy, often called electroconvulsive therapy or ECT, which led to brain damage and destroyed his career.  

The Expert: Dr. Paul Holtzheimer, a professor of psychiatry with expertise in electroconvulsive therapy.

The Verdict: For the Defense.

View AMFS Commentary on the Testimony


Dr. Stephen Abram’s Analysis of Issues in Epidural Injection Procedure Leads to Nearly $22M Verdict

The Trial: Brown v. Southeastern Pain Specialists, P.C., et al., a medical malpractice case in which plaintiff claims negligence during an epidural procedure for pain management led to oxygen deprivation and the patient’s ultimately fatal brain damage.

The Expert: Dr. Stephen Abram, an anesthesiologist based in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

The Verdict: $21.98 million.

View AMFS Commentary on the Testimony


Dr. Gregory Moneta’s Conclusions on Care of Clot Lead to $4.9M Verdict at Med Mal Trial Over Patient’s Leg Amputation

The Trial: Gray v. Iakovidis, a Florida medical malpractice trial in which plaintiff claims he was forced to undergo a below-the-knee amputation because of defendant healthcare providers’ failure to properly treat an acute blood clot in his leg.

The Expert: Dr. Gregory Moneta, a vascular surgeon and professor at the Oregon Health Sciences University, testifies to the standard of care in dealing with a patient who complains of symptoms similar to that of the plaintiff.

The Verdict: $4.9 million.

View AMFS Commentary on the Testimony


Dr. Anne Weber Details Alleged Defects in Pelvic Mesh, Setting Up $68M Verdict

The Trial: McGinnis v. CR Bard, a products liability trial in which plaintiff claims defects in two pelvic mesh implants manufactured by the defendant caused her chronic pain.

The Expert: Dr. Anne Weber, an obstetrician and gynecologist, testifies to the alleged link between the pelvic mesh and plaintiff’s chronic pain.

The Verdict: $68 million, including $33 million compensatory damages and $35 million in punitives.

View AMFS Commentary on the Testimony


Dr. Suneet Chauhan’s Details on Vacuum-Assisted Delivery Help Clear Doctor in Med Mal Case

The Trial: Cantrell v. Moore, a Georgia medical malpractice case in which plaintiff claims a doctor negligently used a vacuum device during childbirth, ultimately injuring the child’s shoulder and leaving her without the use of her arm.

The Expert: Dr. Suneet Chauhan, a professor of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive health at the University of Texas McGovern Medical School, in Houston, details vacuum-assisted delivery and the nature of “pop-offs” in such deliveries, concluding the defendant met the standard of care while using the vacuum device.

The Verdict: For the defense.

View AMFS Commentary on the Testimony


Dr. Ronnie Fuerst’s Testimony Helps Clear ER Doctor in Med Mal Trial Over 12-Year-Old’s Death

The Trial: Kelly v. Indian River Memorial Hospital, a 2016 medical malpractice trial over the death of a 12-year-old girl suffering from diabetes-related complications.

The Expert: Dr. Ronnie Fuerst, a pediatric emergency medicine physician based in South Carolina.  

The Verdict: For the defense.

View AMFS Commentary on the Testimony


Dr. Sanjong Pangarkar’s Conclusions on Plaintiff’s Bus Incident-Related Back Pain Lead to $14.31M Verdict

The Trial: Francisco v. Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District, a 2014 California trial in which plaintiff claims she suffered lifelong back injuries when a public transit bus drove over a speed bump too quickly, sending her airborne and causing her to land on the hard bus seat.

The Expert: Dr. Sanjong Pangarkar, a Los Angeles-based pain medicine specialist, who criticizes the defense expert’s contention that the plaintiff is malingering, and who outlines his opinion on the severity of plaintiff’s injury and her ultimate prognosis.

The Verdict: $14.31 million.

View AMFS Commentary on the Testimony


Dr. Carl Capelouto’s Testimony on Urologist’s Standard of Care Yields Defense Verdict in Fatal Cancer Case

The Trial: Moradov v. Atlanta Radiology Consultants, P.c., et al., a 2017 Georgia state court trial in which plaintiff claims defendants, including a urologist, failed to meet their standard of care when reviewing imaging to detect a kidney growth plaintiff contends ultimately led to fatal kidney cancer.

The Expert: Dr. Carl Capelouto: A Georgia-based urologist testifying as to the standard of care in urological treatment when imaging is performed.

The Verdict: For the Defense.

View AMFS Commentary on the Testimony


Sarah Lustig Details Life Care Plan at Center of $20M Verdict in TBI Trial

The Trial: Khan v. Moore Freight Service, a damages-only, 2016 Georgia trial over catastrophic brain damage a man suffered in a collision with a tractor-trailer.

The Expert: Sarah Lustig, a life care planner based in South Carolina, highlights and explains her recommendations in the life care plan she completed.

The Verdict: $20 million.

View AMFS Commentary on the Testimony


Dr. William Rogers Details Timeline of Patient’s Fatal Heart Attack, Clearing Defendant Physician in Med Mal Trial

The Trial: Cox v. Fatemi, a medical malpractice trial in which plaintiff, the widow of a fatal heart attack victim, claims the defendant physician was negligent in diagnosing her husband, a television sports director, with a virus and that the physician failed to order tests that could have revealed acute coronary syndrome days before he suffered the heart attack.   

The Expert: Dr. William Rogers, a cardiologist and professor at the University of Alabama Birmingham testifies for the defense, explaining his belief that the patient did not suffer from acute coronary syndrome at the time he saw the defendant and concluding the physician appropriately treated the patient.

The Verdict: For the defense.

View AMFS Commentary on the Testimony


Dr. Jeffrey Markham Details Evidence of Plaintiff’s Brain Damage En Route to $20M Verdict in TBI Trial

The Trial: Thompson v. Lamplight Village Homeowner’s Association, a 2018 Nevada premises liability trial in which plaintiff claims he suffered a traumatic brain injury when a swing set’s metal bar broke and struck his head.

The Expert: Dr. Jeffrey Markham, a radiologist from Texas, who testifies as to the extent of the plaintiff’s brain injury.

The Verdict: $20 million, including $10 million in punitive damages.

View AMFS Commentary on the Testimony


Bioengineer Joseph Peles Details the Disastrous Consequences of Rollover, En Route to $4.5M Award

The Trial: Trejo v. Ford, a 2014 Nevada product liability trial in which plaintiff claims roof crush from a rollover of a Ford Excursion killed Rafael Trejo.

The Expert: Joseph Peles, a bioengineering expert and accident reconstruction expert, who testifies for the plaintiff about the forces that led to the death of Rafel Trejo.

The Verdict: $4.5 million.

View AMFS Commentary on the Testimony


Dr. Carolyn Brockington Outlines Treatment of Stroke Patient, Leading to Defense Verdict in Med Mal Case

The Trial:  Roberts v. St. Vincent’s Medical Center, a 2016 Florida medical malpractice trial in which a patient claims defendant doctors’ failure to properly treat her deep vein thrombosis led to her stroke. At issue was whether doctors should have done more than use heparin, and whether they should have promptly inserted a filter to prevent blood clots from reaching her heart.

The Expert: Dr. Carolyn Brockington, M.D., a neurologist based at New York’s Mt. Sinai Hospital, testifies as to the propriety of the defendant neurologist’s treatment.

The Verdict: For the defense.

View AMFS Commentary on the Testimony


Dr. Harry Reynolds’ Testimony Helps Clear Surgeon at Trial Over Colorectal Surgery Complications

The Trial: Robinson v. Duke University Health System, a 2015 North Carolina medical malpractice trial in which plaintiff claims she suffered from “conversion disorder”-- a condition in which patients show signs of physical injury or illness after a traumatic event without any detectable underlying cause—following the inadvertent attachment of her colon to her vagina during intestinal surgery.

The Expert: Dr. Harry Reynolds, a colon and rectal surgeon affiliated with Cleveland Medical Center testifies for the defense and concludes the defendant healthcare providers met the standard of care under the circumstances. He also explains that he is unfamiliar in practice with “conversion disorder.”

The Verdict: For the defense.

View AMFS Commentary on the Testimony